Monthly Archive September 8, 2023


What is Single Payer Health Care?

As healthcare is consistently polling higher than any other issue in the US, discussions over single-payer health care have come to the forefront of political discourse. But what exactly is single payer healthcare, and what would its implementation look like?

Single-payer health care refers to a healthcare system in which all private and public insurance coverage are replaced by one national plan administered by the federal government and funded from national sources. This would differ significantly from our current healthcare system where Medicaid and veterans Affairs benefits cover low-income patients while most people also possess employer-based private healthcare plans in addition to Medicare coverage.

One prominent proposal to create a single-payer healthcare system has been proposed by Sen Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All bill in 2020. This single payer approach seeks to provide universal access to affordable, high-quality health care. Such systems tend to be simpler and less costly than our current healthcare system which blends government programs like Medicare and Medicaid with employer-based plans or marketplaces such as Obamacare (ACA).

Single-payer healthcare offers numerous advantages. First and foremost, it increases access to preventative healthcare services that can help ward off various conditions like heart disease, diabetes, cancer and obesity. Furthermore, administrative expenses account for as much as 15% of healthcare spending in some countries – so reduced overall costs is achieved more easily with single-payer.

As well as improving coordination of care among physicians and providers, single-payer healthcare could also facilitate more efficient use of resources and reduce medical errors overall. While the details of how a single-payer system operates will differ based on individual proposals, most involve government paying directly for all health services rather than multiple entities (like private insurers) being reimbursed individually by individual insurers or providers; legislation typically addresses how this system will be funded, for instance through payroll taxes, income or sales taxes.

Opponents of single-payer healthcare point out its many potential benefits; however, their opposition stems from lack of experience with such systems in other countries, which they claim could result in long wait times for healthcare and reduced options available to citizens. Furthermore, new taxes needed to fund this system would lead to an increase in overall tax burden among its population, especially the wealthy.

Critics of this idea point out that implementation could occur gradually. Vermont passed Green Mountain Care legislation modeled on Canada’s single-payer health system – sometimes used as an umbrella term for socialized medicine – while other nations employ hybrid models where government pays for some health services while private health insurers cover others; one proposal from Center for American Progress would allow people to keep their private insurance while enrolling in a national plan.


Are Poker Machines Legal in South Carolina?

are poker machines legal in south carolina

South Carolina remains one of the few states that still prohibit casino-style gambling; the only forms legal gambling are state lottery and charitable games such as bingo.

State officials attempted to regulate video poker by restricting daily winnings. Machine operators found ways around this restriction by hiding multiple machines within buildings and behind walls.


South Carolina made video poker machines illegal in July 2000, yet operators continue to exploit loopholes to bypass prosecution. One such loophole is due to online gaming not taking place at physical locations making it hard for authorities to bust. Furthermore, South Carolina gambling laws don’t go far enough in prosecuting online games; therefore only legal forms of gambling such as state lotteries and the Big M Casino exist here.

Horry County judge announced in June that 24 gaming machines seized in June should be destroyed, however prosecutors believe this ruling to be nothing but industry gaming the system. Video poker will remain legal in South Carolina until higher courts rule otherwise; state legislature had made it appear as though voters could vote on whether to allow video poker but this wasn’t possible due to state constitution not providing for public legislation of such issues.


South Carolina’s gambling laws are among the strictest in the country, and anyone engaging in illegal gambling activities could face jail time and fines, in addition to having their gaming license suspended and prohibited from operating gaming businesses in South Carolina. If arrested for gambling-related charges it is imperative that they immediately retain an attorney for representation.

South Carolina’s restrictive gambling laws make legal poker play nearly impossible in South Carolina, as their definition of gambling includes any game played with cards – making poker illegal.

In the 1980s, video poker machines began appearing at convenience stores and bars across South Carolina. Soon thereafter, these machines quickly gained in popularity and caused substantial gambling losses among their residents. After several citizens filed lawsuits challenging this industry, South Carolina officials attempted to limit it by restricting how many machines could be located on each property.


South Carolina has some of the strictest gambling laws in the country. Most forms of gambling, including off-track betting and table games, have been prohibited in South Carolina; bingo halls and the state lottery remain legal gambling options while residents can gamble in sweepstakes casinos using a different model with minimum age requirements of 21.

In the 1990s, video poker machines began appearing at bars, convenience stores and gas stations throughout California. State legislators attempted to control them with legislation that limited daily winnings to $125 – this measure was bypassed by operators who simply kept paying out jackpots until that limit had been met. Furthermore, dozens of machines were packed into buildings with walls between them so as to form “video malls,” leading to an enormous operation with little tax revenue for the state.


South Carolina has stringent gambling laws. The Supreme Court ruled that poker machines were unlawful as forms of gambling; however, there is one legal loophole which allows video poker machines operated by licensed casinos with daily payout limits no more than $125.

Machine operatorss must keep an account of all winnings and losses. The state Supreme Court has upheld this limit as constitutional.

Video poker players used to have access to a wide range of machines in bars, strip malls and gas stations across South Carolina. Video poker enthusiasts were even part of a lobby which donated millions to politicians – helping a traditionally Republican state elect a Democrat governor with these funds. Furthermore, these machines provided revenue for many businesses within South Carolina – an industry which had become one of the largest nationally. Unfortunately, South Carolina’s ruling effectively killed this industry; one which was one of its largest in terms of revenue. This issue became one of its most contentious issues within state borders; therefore it garnered public scrutiny throughout South Carolina’s history.